Review 1641: The Dictionary of Lost Words

After reading The Professor and the Madman, Pip Williams got interested in the ways that gender affected the original edition of the OED. She wrote The Dictionary of Lost Words to honor the women who helped produce the dictionary.

As a little girl, Esme becomes fascinated with the strips of paper used to keep track of different uses of words. Her father is the assistant to Dr. Murray, who is in charge of the OED project, and she spends a lot of time sitting under her father’s desk at the Scriptorium. One day, she finds the strip for the word “bondwoman” and puts it in her pocket. She begins collecting duplicate strips or words that will not be included in the dictionary and puts them in a trunk.

As a young woman, she begins working in the Scriptorium. She becomes fascinated with the idea that some words are not allowed in the dictionary because they don’t have a written source. Many of these words, she notices, are related to the poor and to women—words for women’s body parts, professions, epithets for women. She begins collecting her own words from Lizzie, the Murray’s maid, and from common people in the market.

link to Netgalley

This novel not only reflects the love of words but also the events of the time—the battle for women’s suffrage and eventually World War I. At first, I had difficulty getting into it, but that may in part have had to do with my problems with eBooks. Eventually, I was sucked in and found the novel touching, even though a few plot points are predictable.

I received this book from the publisher in exchange for a free and fair review. I had this review already scheduled for posting when I learned that the book made it to the shortlist for the Walter Scott Historical Fiction Prize.

Related Posts

Charlotte and Emily

The Adventure of English: The Biography of a Language

Dreyer’s English: An Utterly Correct Guide to Clarity and Style

6 thoughts on “Review 1641: The Dictionary of Lost Words

  1. Sandra April 6, 2021 / 3:32 pm

    I tried unsuccessfully for an advance copy of this one. I’m hoping my library will have it

  2. Davida Chazan April 7, 2021 / 5:36 am

    I have this on my wish list, but I’ve read mixed reviews, so we’ll see…

  3. Helen April 7, 2021 / 5:55 am

    I’m glad you liked this, even if it took a while to get into. I wasn’t planning to read it, but I will now that it has been shortlisted for the Walter Scott Prize.

    • whatmeread April 7, 2021 / 10:38 am

      I can’t believe I’m more than halfway through this year’s list. I’ve read all the books except one for last year, just haven’t reviewed them yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.