Day 1030: Outline

Cover for OutlineIt was hard for me to decide what I thought of Rachel Cusk’s novel, Outline. It is a difficult novel to describe and seems to be an experiment in fiction. It consists of a series of dialogues where most of the time only one side of the conversation is reported.

The almost unnamed narrator, Faye, is a writer on her way to Athens to teach a writing class. Something about her encourages the people she meets to tell her their stories. The narrator herself seems to be exploring the possibilities of passivity so that she doesn’t herself do or say much; instead, things happen to her. But not much, and that isn’t the point.

The characters’ monologues are written as little gems—sparely expressed and containing interesting intellectual ideas. But there are too many of them for me now to remember which concepts struck me. The overall effect is very cerebral, even though some of the characters express strong emotions.

I am not generally fond of monologues. It was hard for me to tell whether we are to assume that the narrator seldom speaks or whether, as one reviewer assumed, her part of the dialogue has been excised. In addition, the monologues are not written as speech but mostly as narrative, lending even more inertness to the work. I remember going to a play called “Danton’s Death” where instead of talking to each other, the characters took turns declaiming. The effect to me was a series of rants. This novel doesn’t have that effect because of the narrative. I was interested in the characters’ stories, but I wasn’t moved by them.

Related Posts

The Sunken Cathedral

Great House

My Name is Lucy Barton

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Day 1030: Outline

  1. Rick @ AnotherBook.blog January 26, 2017 / 12:15 pm

    I read Outline last year and it seemed for the longest time that I was the only person who didn’t seem to jive with it. I don’t know. I just don’t at all get the hoopla around this book. I wanted to like it. I really, really wanted to. I think the concept is fascinating. Even reading your short description makes me want to read it again. But I can remember feeling so ambivalent towards every character. Maybe it’ll require a re-read. I might have been in a bad head space. Not sure.

    Thanks for reminding me!

    • whatmeread January 27, 2017 / 10:58 am

      I can certainly relate to your comments. I thought it was interesting but not great.

  2. Naomi January 26, 2017 / 4:13 pm

    This is actually one of those rare books that I only read part of and then decided not to continue. I found I just didn’t care about anyone in the book. Maybe I would have felt differently if I had stuck it out, or read it at a different time.

    • whatmeread January 27, 2017 / 11:00 am

      I think I felt pretty much the same and only finished it because it was chosen for a book club.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s