Day 936: Valiant Ambition: George Washington, Benedict Arnold, and the Fate of the American Revolution

Cover for Valiant AmbitionAlthough he has written on other subjects, Nathaniel Philbrick has made a specialty of writing about events and industries that affected New England, including the Revolutionary War. His latest book concentrates on the forces and personality flaws that resulted in Benedict Arnold’s betrayal of his country.

I haven’t read much about Benedict Arnold, only one novel, Rabble in Arms by Kenneth Roberts. That novel painted him in surprisingly sympathetic colors, blaming his treachery largely on the rapacious demands for money of his wife Peggy. Philbrick’s view is more nuanced.

Certainly, at the beginning of the war you can sympathize with Washington and with Arnold. For his part, Washington was hamstrung by the ineffectiveness and bickering of the Continental Congress. He had very little power over such decisions as which of his officers would receive promotion, which lead to the initial difficulties with Arnold.

A key to the British strategy of cutting off New England from the rest of the country was the chain of lakes leading down from Canada to the Hudson. So, Fort Ticonderoga was an important target. Benedict Arnold and a rag-tag collection of boats prevented the British from approaching the fort in the fall of 1776, before the lakes could freeze up to keep the British out.

As the hero of this engagement and the senior Brigadier General in the Continental Army, Arnold expected a promotion. But the Congress devised an idiotic scheme that awarded the promotions not on merit but according to what state the person was from. Since Connecticut already had two Major Generals, Congress awarded the promotions to other Brigadier Generals who were junior to Arnold, some of whom were only mediocre in ability. Washington protested this decision, to no avail. Even after he got his promotion, Arnold was forced to defer to these men who were promoted before him.

link to NetgalleyIt was this kind of bickering about states’ rights and even local rights versus the rights of a national government that hampered the Congress. In addition, there were plenty of people out for what they could get. I was shocked to read that while no one was interested in supporting the Continental Army, to the point where they were starving and dressed in rags, the rest of the country was doing very well financially. Arnold joined into this self-enrichment when he was made military governor of Philadelphia after it was captured back from the British. He was actively engaged in all kinds of corruption.

Philbrick’s book is really interesting and sometimes quite exciting as it revisits key scenes from the war and leads up to Arnold’s big betrayal. His conclusions about the results of the betrayal are startling.

Related Posts

Away Off Shore: Nantucket Island and Its People, 1602-1890

Mayflower

Abigail Adams

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Day 936: Valiant Ambition: George Washington, Benedict Arnold, and the Fate of the American Revolution

  1. Naomi July 18, 2016 / 2:37 pm

    It’s good to see you liked this! I’ve been waiting to hear about it. I loved In the Heart of the Sea so much, that I really should read one of his others. This book sounds like it takes over from a book I read a couple of months ago set during the Napoleonic wars and leading up to the beginning of this one. (Hangman’s Beach)

    • whatmeread July 18, 2016 / 3:45 pm

      I haven’t read Heart of the Sea yet, but I have read three others by him. The only one I thought had some problems was the one about Nantucket, but I think maybe that was the first book he wrote, and it kind of read like he was commissioned by the Nantucket chamber of commerce to write it. It assumed a lot of knowledge of Nantucket as it is now, and I have none. I think the Napoleonic Wars were after the American Revolution, weren’t they? The American Revolution started in 1776, and the French Revolution was 1789, and Napoleon was after that, I think.

      • Naomi July 18, 2016 / 8:04 pm

        Oh, yes, you’re right. I was thinking of the war of 1812!

      • whatmeread July 19, 2016 / 7:21 am

        That makes more sense.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s